Most people would agree cookies make life better. For us, they help us improve our website. If you don’t like cookies, that’s okay – you can let us know by clicking the manage cookies’ button. Read more.
Manage cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and understand what people are reading on our website. The data is collected in a way that does not directly identify anyone or infringe on your privacy.
More in Common took shape from work undertaken since 2016 to understand why so many societies were dividing around debates about their identity and belonging, and why people were being increasingly persuaded to see debates about immigration, refugees and diversity through the lens of ‘us-versus-them’. Since then, we have broadened our research agenda and incorporated several layers of social psychology research to provide a deeper analysis of the different factors contributing to polarization and social fracturing.
More in Common’s published studies of public attitudes in several European countries and the United States are already regarded as among the most insightful and actionable analyses of public opinion. Our team also published papers on polarization, social media and the psychology of political behavior.
Attitudes Towards National Identity, Immigration, and Refugees in Germany
July 2017
Germans remain among the most supportive populations of immigration in Europe. Yet, many Germans hold mixed views about the integration of refugees into German society, especially concerning those from Muslim backgrounds. How will German society appeal to its historical sense of responsibility towards people seeking protection from conflict?
The Priority Gap: Insights on the 2024 Election Outcome
January 0001
Following the 2024 election, More in Common surveyed 5,005 Americans to explore what shaped their voting decisions, how they perceive polarization and division, and –most importantly–how they understand one another.
